Comerica Inc. v. Fifth 3rd Bankcorp, 282 F. Supp. 2d 557 (Age.D. Mich. 2003)

Comerica Inc. v. Fifth 3rd Bankcorp, 282 F. Supp. 2d 557 (Age.D. Mich. 2003)

COMERICA Provided, an excellent Delaware corporation, Plaintiff, v. 5th Third BANKCORP, a lender holding company, 5th 3rd Lender, a great Michigan rent bank, and you will Fifth Third Financial, a kansas charter bank, Defendants.

This is exactly a trademark instance saying violation within the violation from section 43 of one’s Lanham Exchange- Act), fifteen You.S.C. 1125(a) and M.C.L.Good. 429.4(a).

Plaintiff Comerica Integrated (Comerica) try a commercial bank based for the Detroit, Michigan having a primary visibility about all the way down half of the brand new down peninsula away from Michigan. Additionally operates in two almost every other says. Defendants Fifth 3rd Bankcorp, 5th 3rd Bank, a beneficial Michigan constitution financial, and you can 5th Third Bank, a kansas charter Financial (together, 5th 3rd) is a commercial bank headquartered when you look at the Cincinnati, Kansas which have a critical visibility throughout the down peninsula off Michigan. What’s more, it works within the seven almost every other Midwestern claims.

A house equity financing product is essentially a flexible line of borrowing from the bank protected by borrower’s collateral on the borrower’s home as a result of an extra home loan. Continue reading “Comerica Inc. v. Fifth 3rd Bankcorp, 282 F. Supp. 2d 557 (Age.D. Mich. 2003)”